Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, provided by a community of experts. Get immediate and reliable answers to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Yes (It's more inefficient)
Explanation:
in ecology there are things called primary producers (plants) that are eaten by primary consumers (cows and chickens) and then there are humans, secondary consumers, that eat cows and chickens for energy.
The further we move from eating primary producers the more inefficient we become in consuming energy. Meaning, it requires a lot more natural energy consumption to support a human that lives on meat only as compared to a human that eats plants only. this inefficiency only magnifies when communities practice unsustainable food methods.
There are sustainable ways to eat meat, but (at least in the US) our current conventions of meat production are unsustainable and environmentally destructive.
We hope our answers were helpful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you may have. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.
