Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation were not very effective to the U.S governments. In the short term, it seems like a great idea, but as time went on, the flaws of the A.O.C started to show. For example, there was no established military, making it hard for the United States to defend itself as a new country. Another flaw, and one of the biggest was that there was no executive branch. Due to this congress couldn't enforce or implement their laws that they passed. Other weaknesses include, no power to collect taxes, Congress couldn't regulate trade, approval of nine states to enact a law, and no national court system. On top of all this in order to amend or get rid of the Articles of Confederation, an unanimous vote was needed. All of this made the Articles of Confederation very weak and not beneficial to the United States. I would say overall i would rate the A.O.C a 5 out of 10. This is because it had MANY flaws, but from these flaws the United States was able to make a constitution with more appropriate guidelines for the United States.
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.
