Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the convenience of getting reliable answers to your questions from a vast network of knowledgeable experts. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Researchers found that in the United States and Canada, homicide rates doubled over a time in which TV with violent programming was introduced. This finding does not prove that viewing violence on TV causes aggression because

Sagot :

facundo3141592

Because there could be other changes in that timeframe that could be the cause of the increase in violence, and we don't have information about that, so we can't conclude anything with the given information alone.

How to know when information is valid enough to prove something?

So, we know that homicide rates doubled over a time in which TV with violent programming was introduced.

So you could conclude that "violence on TV increased the aggression"?

No.

That is because, in that timeframe, the inclusion of violence in TV was not the only change that happened. So to draw an actual conclusion, we should list all the changes that happened in that timeframe and study the possible relations that these have with an increase in violence.

This is why this finding does not prove that viewing violence on TV causes aggression.

If you want to learn more about evidence, you can read:

https://brainly.com/question/4207376

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.