Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
Answer: 3
Explanation:
You want to use the Rydberg equation which is given by
[tex]E = -R_{H}(\frac{1}{n_{final}^2} - \frac{1}{n_{initial}^2})[/tex]
where [tex]R_H = 2.18 \, \cdot 10^{-18} J[/tex].
We are however given the wavelength instead of energy, and so we need to represent E in terms of its wavelength, and so we use [tex]E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}[/tex]. Remember that λ must be in meters in this formula. So we can divide 1284 nm by [tex]10^9[/tex] to get the wavelength in meters. This gives [tex]\lambda = 1.284 \, \cdot 10^{-6}[/tex] meters. Putting this all together we have
[tex]\frac{hc}{\lambda} = -R_{H}(\frac{1}{n_{final}^2} - \frac{1}{n_{initial}^2})[/tex]
where
[tex]h = 6.626 \cdot 10^{-34} J\cdot s\\c = 2.998 \cdot 10^{8}\, m/s\\\lambda = 1.284 \cdot 10^{-6}\, m\\R_H = 2.18 \, \cdot 10^{-18} J\\n_{initial} = 5\\n_{final} = \, ?[/tex]
If we plug in everything we should get roughly [tex]n_f = 3.00194[/tex] but remember that orbitals must be a whole number and so you would round to the closest integer which gives [tex]n_f = 3.[/tex]
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.