Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
Answer: 3
Explanation:
You want to use the Rydberg equation which is given by
[tex]E = -R_{H}(\frac{1}{n_{final}^2} - \frac{1}{n_{initial}^2})[/tex]
where [tex]R_H = 2.18 \, \cdot 10^{-18} J[/tex].
We are however given the wavelength instead of energy, and so we need to represent E in terms of its wavelength, and so we use [tex]E = \frac{hc}{\lambda}[/tex]. Remember that λ must be in meters in this formula. So we can divide 1284 nm by [tex]10^9[/tex] to get the wavelength in meters. This gives [tex]\lambda = 1.284 \, \cdot 10^{-6}[/tex] meters. Putting this all together we have
[tex]\frac{hc}{\lambda} = -R_{H}(\frac{1}{n_{final}^2} - \frac{1}{n_{initial}^2})[/tex]
where
[tex]h = 6.626 \cdot 10^{-34} J\cdot s\\c = 2.998 \cdot 10^{8}\, m/s\\\lambda = 1.284 \cdot 10^{-6}\, m\\R_H = 2.18 \, \cdot 10^{-18} J\\n_{initial} = 5\\n_{final} = \, ?[/tex]
If we plug in everything we should get roughly [tex]n_f = 3.00194[/tex] but remember that orbitals must be a whole number and so you would round to the closest integer which gives [tex]n_f = 3.[/tex]
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.