Answered

Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

1. Describe the clamming industry in the 1970 and how it used to be a serious business.

2. According to the July 1985 New York Times article, what is to blame for the decline in the clamming industry?

3. What is the ground-breaking “208 Study” and what did it lead to on Long Island?

4. List and describe three solutions that the author thinks we can make to improve our declining water quality?


Sagot :

The clamming industry in Long Island used to be very lucrative, raking in as much as $100 Million annually. By the 1970s, it had shrunk to less that $40 million per annum.

What was to blame for the decline according to the article mentioned above?

2. According to the New York Times Article of 1985, the reason for the steep decline in the value of the Clamming industry was related to the loss of confidence in the health safety of eating raw shellfish.

3. According to the remarkable discovery of the "208 Study", it was discovered that there was a connection between land use and underground water quality. It was also discovered there was a negative impact of dumping sewers in the ocean on the production of shellfish

4. Some of the solutions that were proposed to manage this situation are:

  • Using sewers to collect effluents into a septic treatment plant. rather than dumping them into the ocean.
  • The implementation of secondary sewage treatment supplemented by ocean disposal of the effluents and
  • Monitoring the salinity levels of the clamp ecosystem.

Learn more about the Long Island at:

https://brainly.com/question/8012248