Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Dear Editor,

I am writing regarding the Editorial section in the newspaper. I typically enjoy reading the well thought out and well-structured opinion pieces you feature. The letters to the editor often spark discussion between my friends and me. The political cartoons don’t normally make me laugh aloud, but I enjoy their social commentary, nonetheless. However, from time to time, I find I don’t get the joke or the point.
I don’t feel that something as serious as the housing crisis should be trivialized in a cartoon about Halloween. I also don’t think Fair and Ethical Treatment for All Animals (FETAA), and other animal lovers will appreciate the latest depiction of police harming a chimpanzee, especially without any context.
The purpose of political cartoons is to take headlines and turn them into thought-provoking discussion pieces, not trivialize them into punchlines.

Sincerely,

A Concerned Reader


What method does the author of this letter use to persuade?
A.
analogy
B.
compare and contrast
C.
argument by emotion
D.
argument by authority

Sagot :

Answer:

Hey we meet again, the Answer is A. :)

Explanation: