Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.


How does the author of Source 3 most clearly counter the argument in Source 1 that
protecting giant pandas and the "restricted range" in which they live will not benefit
biodiversity hot spots?


Sagot :

The author of Source 3 counters the argument regarding giant pandas by stating that they're beneficial to the ecosystem.

What is an argument?

It should be noted that an argument simply means the stance of an individual regarding an issue.

In this case, the author of Source 3 most clearly counter the argument in Source 1 that protecting giant pandas isn't appropriate by stating that they play an important role in the ecosystem.

Learn more about arguments on:

https://brainly.com/question/3775579