Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
B. True The U.S army at the time wasn’t even a country with inly a certain amount if colonies, so yes the British army was bigger.
Answer:
True!
Explanation:
The British military forces were far more developed than the Colonial Army. At the time, in fact, Britain's army was considered to be the most efficient in the entire world. Their navy prevailed over the seas. Meanwhile, the Colonial army was underdeveloped and somewhat "rag-tag." They were poorly trained and equipped, perhaps up until they received help from the French (thank you, Marquis de LaFayette!)
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.