At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Join our Q&A platform and connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.
Sagot :
Based on the calculations, the approximate ductility (%el) of this brass is equal to 2.3%.
Given the following data:
- Yield strength = 230 mpa (33360 psi).
What is ductility?
Ductility can be defined as an important property of a material which determines its ability to become elongated due to the application of stress.
Mathematically, the ductility of a material can be expressed as percentage elongation in length:
[tex]\% el = \frac{\Delta L}{L_i} =\frac{L_f - L_i}{L_i}[/tex]
Where:
- [tex]L_i[/tex] is the original length.
- [tex]L_f[/tex] is the final length.
- [tex]\Delta L[/tex] is the yield strength.
For this exercise, let us assume the original length of this brass is equal to 100 meters.
Substituting the parameters into the formula, we have;
[tex]\% el = \frac{230}{100}[/tex]
Ductility = 2.3%.
Read more on ductility here: https://brainly.com/question/828860
The approximate ductility (%el) of a brass that has a yield strength of 230 mpa is 2.3%.
How do we calculate the approximate ductility?
Approximate ductility of any substance will be calculated by using the below equation as:
%el = ΔL / L₁, where
- ΔL = yield strength = 230 MPa
- L₁ = initial length = 100 MPa (assume)
On putting this values, we get
%el = 230/100 = 2.3%
Hence 2.3% is the approximate ductility.
To know more about ductility, visit the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/16496121
#SPJ4
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.