Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

A computer company wants to determine if there is difference in the proportions of defective computer chips in a day's production from two different production plants A and B. A quality control specialist takes a random sample of 100 chips from the day's production from plant A, and determines that there are 12 defective chips. The specialist
then takes a random sample of 100 chips from the day's production from plant B, and determines that there are 10 defective chips. Based on the 90% confidence interval, (0.05, 0.09), is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions of defective chips from a day's production between the two plants?

O There is convincing evidence because the sample proportions of defective chips for the two plants are different

O There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0

O There is convincing evidence because the difference in the two sample proportions is 0.02. Since this is not 0, there is a difference in the true proportions of defective chips for the two plants.

O There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains both negative and positive values.

Sagot :

There is not convincing evidence
kimreza127

Answer:

B. There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.