Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

A computer company wants to determine if there is difference in the proportions of defective computer chips in a day's production from two different production plants A and B. A quality control specialist takes a random sample of 100 chips from the day's production from plant A, and determines that there are 12 defective chips. The specialist
then takes a random sample of 100 chips from the day's production from plant B, and determines that there are 10 defective chips. Based on the 90% confidence interval, (0.05, 0.09), is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions of defective chips from a day's production between the two plants?

O There is convincing evidence because the sample proportions of defective chips for the two plants are different

O There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0

O There is convincing evidence because the difference in the two sample proportions is 0.02. Since this is not 0, there is a difference in the true proportions of defective chips for the two plants.

O There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains both negative and positive values.

Sagot :

There is not convincing evidence
kimreza127

Answer:

B. There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.