Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
A strong argument used to support the ratification of the U.S. Constitution was that C) there was a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. This was a major fear of the early Americans especially those that strongly supported states' rights.
Answer:
C. There is a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.
Explanation:
During the debates to ratify the U.S. Constitution as we know it today, two main groups emerged: those who supported it alleging that it was necessary to establish a strong central government with enough enforce powers to properly lead the nation (the Federalists), and those who opposed its ratification believing that it gave too much power to the government and did not specify people's rights, which would inevitably lead the government to abuse its powers (the Anti-federalists).
However, to this objection, the Federalists argued that under the newly proposed constitution the government was divided into three branches who would rule under the system of checks and balances, which it's a system whereby each branch of the government can oversee, limit and check the actions of the other, and this way, the system could prevent abuse of power.
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.