Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
A strong argument used to support the ratification of the U.S. Constitution was that C) there was a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. This was a major fear of the early Americans especially those that strongly supported states' rights.
Answer:
C. There is a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.
Explanation:
During the debates to ratify the U.S. Constitution as we know it today, two main groups emerged: those who supported it alleging that it was necessary to establish a strong central government with enough enforce powers to properly lead the nation (the Federalists), and those who opposed its ratification believing that it gave too much power to the government and did not specify people's rights, which would inevitably lead the government to abuse its powers (the Anti-federalists).
However, to this objection, the Federalists argued that under the newly proposed constitution the government was divided into three branches who would rule under the system of checks and balances, which it's a system whereby each branch of the government can oversee, limit and check the actions of the other, and this way, the system could prevent abuse of power.
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.