Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
A strong argument used to support the ratification of the U.S. Constitution was that C) there was a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power. This was a major fear of the early Americans especially those that strongly supported states' rights.
Answer:
C. There is a system of checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.
Explanation:
During the debates to ratify the U.S. Constitution as we know it today, two main groups emerged: those who supported it alleging that it was necessary to establish a strong central government with enough enforce powers to properly lead the nation (the Federalists), and those who opposed its ratification believing that it gave too much power to the government and did not specify people's rights, which would inevitably lead the government to abuse its powers (the Anti-federalists).
However, to this objection, the Federalists argued that under the newly proposed constitution the government was divided into three branches who would rule under the system of checks and balances, which it's a system whereby each branch of the government can oversee, limit and check the actions of the other, and this way, the system could prevent abuse of power.
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.