Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Ask your questions and receive accurate answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields on our platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

A comparison between species: Biologists wish to compare the prevalence of a genetic mutation across
two species of Neema Toads. In a sample of 9 Neema Toads of Species I, 0.6% had the mutation while in a
sample of 12 Neema Toads of Species II, 1% showed the mutation. Is there significant evidence to suggest a
difference in the prevalence of the mutation across the two species? Conduct a hypothesis test at a
significance level of a = 0.01.


Sagot :

The result from the hypotheis test below shows that there is no significant evidence existing to show difference in the mutation.

How to solve for the z statistics

The hypothesis for this test has been stated below:

H0: pI - pII = 0

Ha: pI - pII ≠ 0

n1 = 9

p1 = 0.6%

n2 = 12

p2 = 1%

Using the z statistics formula

[tex]\frac{0.006-0.01}{\sqrt{0.000663+0.000825} } \\\\\frac{-0.004}{\sqrt{0.001488} }[/tex]

z = -0.103

p value = z(-0.103) = 0.4589

The pvalue is greater that 0.01

The decision is to fail to reject the null hypothesis.

There is no significant evidence to show that there is a difference in the prevalence of mutation.

Read more on hypothesis testing here: https://brainly.com/question/15980493

'