ZimaLeisure0
Answered

Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Explain the pros and cons of choosing leaders based on their achieved status rather than
their ascribed status.


Sagot :

jaquelinefvr

The pros of choosing leaders based on achieved status is choosing based on individual efforts and merits.

The cons, on the other hand, correspond to the high expectations that individuals may have about the leader based on their characteristics.

What is assigned and achieved status?

The ascribed status is a concept that refers to the status that an individual receives at the time of his birth, that is, without reference to his individual qualities.

Achieved status, on the other hand, is related to the individual's skills and achievements acquired through personal effort.

Therefore, choosing a leader based on achieved status can be positive because it is based on innate qualities and proven skills necessary for leadership.

Find out more about achieved status here:

https://brainly.com/question/26412432

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.