ZimaLeisure0
Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately from our dedicated community of professionals. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Explain the pros and cons of choosing leaders based on their achieved status rather than
their ascribed status.


Sagot :

jaquelinefvr

The pros of choosing leaders based on achieved status is choosing based on individual efforts and merits.

The cons, on the other hand, correspond to the high expectations that individuals may have about the leader based on their characteristics.

What is assigned and achieved status?

The ascribed status is a concept that refers to the status that an individual receives at the time of his birth, that is, without reference to his individual qualities.

Achieved status, on the other hand, is related to the individual's skills and achievements acquired through personal effort.

Therefore, choosing a leader based on achieved status can be positive because it is based on innate qualities and proven skills necessary for leadership.

Find out more about achieved status here:

https://brainly.com/question/26412432

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.