Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Our platform connects you with professionals ready to provide precise answers to all your questions in various areas of expertise. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
In Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled B. If the police violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled B. If the police violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at https://brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.