Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
In Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled B. If the police violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled B. If the police violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at https://brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.