At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of seasoned experts on our user-friendly platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Read the two passages from arguments on water conservation.

Passage 1:

After stricter water-usage restrictions were passed, residents started using less water per month. This shows how legislation can influence citizens’ actions and why more restrictions are needed to further decrease water waste. Government action is the best way to effect lasting environmental change.

Passage 2:

Citizens showed their dedication to water conservation by responding positively to new water restrictions and lowering their water usage. This indicates that no new restrictions need to be put in place. Our residents are concerned about water conservation and will work hard to keep water waste to a minimum.

How do these authors use the same evidence about water usage to support their arguments?

The authors expand on the evidence to different degrees.
The authors disagree about the validity of the evidence.
The authors use the evidence to attack and discredit their opponent.
The authors agree on the problem but offer different solutions.

Sagot :

Answer:

D: The authors offer different solutions but agree on the same problem.

Explanation:

The author in Passage 1 suggests that if you put stricter restrictions on water, people will need to stop using so much water, in Passage 2 the author suggests that since people already conserve their water, it's best to not add any of these restrictions as it isn't needed. Both agree on that people should stop wasting water, but passage 1 says that we should add strict regulations whilst passage 2 says that there's no need as people already conserve water.