Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

J(2,−1), K(4,−5), L(3, 1) reflection x axis

Sagot :

aelazrag97

Answer:

△JKL is not congruent to △J′K′L′ because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps △JKL to △J′K′L′.

Step-by-step explanation:

If L' were (-3,-4), it would be a reflection of L across the x-axis as J' and K' are with respect to J and K. Unfortunately, because it is not, the side lengths J'L' and K'L' of triangle J'K'L' are different from those of triangle JKL. This ensures the triangles JKL and J'K'L' are not congruent.

- Jackson

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.