Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Explore thousands of questions and answers from knowledgeable experts in various fields on our Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Read the excerpt from Jahiem’s argumentative essay.

It is imperative that elementary school students have their nap times revoked. Children under ten do not have enough responsibility to require an established rest time. In contrast, teenagers participate in extracurricular activities that require their full focus and energy. Sure, both ages are growing rapidly, but which group really needs more sleep? High schools should implement built-in rest time for teenagers to ensure that they are successful in their endeavors. Schools must choose between having rested children or rested teenagers.

Which reason does Jahiem give for presenting the false dilemma in the excerpt?

Children under ten have less stressful responsibilities than teenagers.
Elementary schools should stop giving younger children naptime.
Teenagers have activities that require focus and energy.
Elementary school children are not growing like teenagers.


Sagot :

The reason provided by the author to support this false dilemma is that "Teenagers have activities that require focus and energy."

What is the false dilemma in this text?

The author proposes only teenagers not children should have a rest time at school, which is a fallacy because it is not necessary to choose either teenagers or children.

What is the reason?

The reason the author provides to support this idea is that "Teenagers have activities that require focus and energy" this is expressed in "teenagers participate in extracurricular activities that require their full focus and energy".

Leanr more about fallacy in: https://brainly.com/question/14669739

#SPJ1

Answer:

C. Teenagers have activities that require focus and energy.

Explanation:

trust