Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Explore in-depth answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts across different fields. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Answer:
Second answer choice (guns) is right
Explanation:
McDonald v. Chicago is about guns, that's all you need to know to solve the problem, since no other choices mention guns.
Answer:
a) The Supreme Court has the power to declare laws and presidential actions unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Federalists believe the federal and state governments are separate, independent organizations. The Constitution grants the federal government a restricted range of authorities, leaving the rest to the states.
The federal system separates powers. The federal system promotes federal-state cooperation and competition. The federal government can pass laws, but states can too.
This system guarantees the executive and judicial departments have equal power. The Supreme Court defends federalism. The Supreme Court may invalidate unlawful legislation and presidential acts. This is judicial review.
Judicial review invalidates unconstitutional laws. McDonald v. Chicago said the Second Amendment protects gun ownership. This verdict-maintained federalism as a U.S. concept.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.