Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

here are the questions.

Here Are The Questions class=
Here Are The Questions class=
Here Are The Questions class=
Here Are The Questions class=
Here Are The Questions class=

Sagot :

Answer:

1. b) The 14th amendment enabled the government to reinterpret the purpose and usage of the Bill of Rights.

2. c) The Supreme Court used incorporation because states were violating the Bill of Rights.

3. b) Incorporation binds states to the Bill of Rights rather than the Federal Government.

4. c) "When the 14th Amendment was ratified...., it placed limits on the kinds of laws states could pass"

5. d) The incorporation of the 14th amendment may not benefit all Americans equally.

Explanation:

  • The Supreme Court has only adopted certain Bill of Rights modifications. They haven't protected all rights against governmental intrusion, so they're not done. C explains the Supreme Court's incorporation, so it's the most correct. The Supreme Court successfully utilized incorporation to stop state Bill of Rights violations.
  • In general, incorporation has had a positive impact on American civil rights. As a result, it has ensured that both state and federal governments are held to the same standard in protecting the rights of individuals.
  • State and municipal governments were compelled to defend "most liberties included in the Bill of Rights" under the 14th Amendment, which was originally intended for recently freed slaves. There was no need that states comply by the constraints it put on the federal government, as stated above. All of this is accurate. There was a Supreme Court decision that had a major influence on our federalist system that is referenced in this quotation about incorporation. A state's power is limited when it comes to federally protected rights when it comes to enacting an unlawful legislation.