Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

In sentence 7 (reproduced below), the writer is considering adding the parenthetical phrase "(another hazard to humans in cars)" after the word "off." In fact, often street lights are shut off in order to decrease the number of mayflies congregating near them. Should the writer make this addition? Yes, because it emphasizes the importance of the evidence about the hazards of street lights. Yes, because it emphasizes the importance of the evidence about the hazards of street lights. Yes, because it connects the evidence offered in the sentence to the paragraph's main claim. Yes, because it connects the evidence offered in the sentence to the paragraph's main claim. No, because it interrupts the fluidity of the sentence. No, because it interrupts the fluidity of the sentence. No, because it distracts from the narration of human responses to mayflies. No, because it distracts from the narration of human responses to mayflies.

Sagot :

From the text it can be inferred that  the writer should make the addition because: "it emphasizes the importance of the evidence about the hazards of street lights" (Option A).

What is the purpose of evidence?

Evidence based claims are the best kind of claims because they present a strong argument.

Hence, it is right to state that the writer should make the addition because: "it emphasizes the importance of the evidence about the hazards of street lights"

Learn more about textual evidence at:

https://brainly.com/question/375033
#SPJ1