Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Our Q&A platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from experts in various disciplines. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial
holdings in India because they:
A. produced valuable natural resources for Great Britain.
OB. broke away from British control almost immediately.
OC. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
OD. granted native populations equal political rights.

Sagot :

Parrain

New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.

How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?

New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.

India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.

Find out more on the Austrialia colony at https://brainly.com/question/4196080.

#SPJ1

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.