Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial
holdings in India because they:
A. produced valuable natural resources for Great Britain.
OB. broke away from British control almost immediately.
OC. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
OD. granted native populations equal political rights.

Sagot :

Parrain

New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.

How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?

New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.

India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.

Find out more on the Austrialia colony at https://brainly.com/question/4196080.

#SPJ1

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.