Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial
holdings in India because they:
A. produced valuable natural resources for Great Britain.
OB. broke away from British control almost immediately.
OC. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
OD. granted native populations equal political rights.

Sagot :

Parrain

New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.

How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?

New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.

India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.

Find out more on the Austrialia colony at https://brainly.com/question/4196080.

#SPJ1

Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.