Answered

Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial
holdings in India because they:
A. produced valuable natural resources for Great Britain.
OB. broke away from British control almost immediately.
OC. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
OD. granted native populations equal political rights.

Sagot :

Parrain

New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.

How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?

New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.

India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.

Find out more on the Austrialia colony at https://brainly.com/question/4196080.

#SPJ1

Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.