Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Sue and tim are arguing about the value of appointing rather than electing federal judges. tim says they are appointed because they need to be independent. what does
he mean?
o judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. if that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations
of law.
o judges receive their commissions from the president so they are independent in the sense that only the president needs to approve their decisions, not other
officials.
o judges make decisions in isolation from other judges so that their interpretations of the law are not affected by the opinions or judgments of the associate
judges.
o judges are like other federal officials and must consider the people's will when deciding a case, they consult with other officials and the president to make
decisions.


Sagot :

By this statement, Tim wants to say that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.

Who are federal judges?

Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. They are nominated by the president and confirmed by the senate.

Tim means that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.

Therefore, A is the correct option.

Learn more about Federal judges here:

https://brainly.com/question/15877634

#SPJ1