Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

The Smith family has very little money and no health insurance. A researcher approaches them and promises free health care for their three children for two years if he can subject the children to a series of experimental vaccines. However, the researcher does not disclose that the vaccine may have serious side effects. The Smiths elect to participate, being unaware of the dangers involved. According to the American Psychological Association [APA] code of ethics, the researcher is violating the principle of:

Sagot :

abiolataiwo2015

According to the American Psychological Association [APA] code of ethics, the researcher is violating the principle of: informed consent.

What is informed consent?

Informed consent  states that a client or patient should  have enough information about the medical care they are going  to receive from a health practitioner before allowing the practitioner to care for them.

Based on the given scenario the researcher violated the principle of informed consent because he did not disclose that the vaccine may have side effect.

Therefore  the researcher is violating the principle of: informed consent.

Learn more about informed consent here:https://brainly.com/question/26830148

#SPJ1

Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.