Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Since the proof for x = 30, the missing reason in step 3 is known to be angle addition postulate.
What is angle addition postulate?
This is known to be the law that state that when one put two or more angles side by side making them to share a common vertex and also an arm between the both pair of angles, then the sum of those angles will then be the same with the total sum of the resulting angle.
Since T = is the interior of straight angle ∠VRS.
m∠VRS = 180° ( is a straight line angle)
So, based on the angle addition postulate says that:
m∠TRS + m∠TRV = 180°.
Therefore, since the proof for x = 30, the missing reason in step 3 is angle addition postulate.
Learn more about angle addition postulate from
https://brainly.com/question/24782727
#SPJ1


We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.