Discover the best answers at Westonci.ca, where experts share their insights and knowledge with you. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

How was John Locke's political theory different from the divine
right of kings? (at least 2-3 sentences)

Sagot :

Answer:

Locke argued against the divine right of kings to rule and instead defended a liberal egalitarian political philosophy on which people have equal and natural rights to liberty. Liberty, in Locke's thought, should be understood as being free from domination by others.In the Two Treatises of Government, he defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. He argued that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society. Locke used the claim that men are naturally free and equal as part of the justification for understanding legitimate political government as the result of a social contract where people in the state of nature conditionally transfer some of their rights to the government in order to better ensure the stable, comfortable enjoyment of their lives, liberty, and property.

We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.