Discover a wealth of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts provide answers to your most pressing questions. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Answer:
False
Step-by-step explanation:
P is not necessarily on the angle bisector of angle A.
Attached is an example of a carefully constructed shape (so that it's easy to see the measurements):
- Angle A measures 45° (again, for convenience)
- Point P is 4 units to the right of and 3 units above point A.
- Point P forms a right angle with two congruent line segments, each of which terminate on the rays extending from Point A, forming angle A.
- The lower point is 8 units to the right of point A; the upper point is 7 units to the right of and 7 units above point A.
- The length of the two line segments is 5 units, and thus they are congruent.
Visually, point P is not on the angle bisector of angle A.
While having two adjacent congruent segments is necessary for P to be on the bisector of angle A, it is not sufficient. The segments on the rays from A to the end of those segments would also need to be a pair of congruent adjacent sides (forming a kite). For a kite, the diagonal from the point between one pair of adjacent congruent sides to the point between the other pair of adjacent congruent sides does form an angle bisector with both angles.
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.