At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Which statement best explains why the evidence provided in the text is a fallacy?

The speaker uses anecdotal evidence with phrases like “back on the right track.”
The speaker uses a bandwagon statement by complaining that other nations prosper.
The speaker uses an ad hominem argument by attacking an opponent’s honesty.
The speaker uses a false dilemma by claiming to have the ideal plan.


Sagot :

The statement that best explains why the evidence provided in the text is a fallacy is C. 'The speaker uses an ad hominem argument by attacking an opponent’s honesty.

What is Fallacy?

This refers to the improper use of logic and a faulty conclusion when making an argument.

Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is the use of narration to talk about the fallacious statement while there is the use of ad hominem to attack the character of his opponent, rather than his points.

Read more about fallacies here:

https://brainly.com/question/20939336

#SPJ1

Answer:

C) The speaker uses an ad hominem argument by attacking an opponent's honesty.

Read the passage from a debate speech.

The current trade situation in this nation is unacceptable. We continue to lose money to other nations, while those nations prosper. I have a detailed plan to get our country—and its people—back on the right track. My opponent, who uses her time to spread lies and rumors while eating nice dinners bought by you taxpayers, does not even have a plan. I question her priorities.

The sentence: "who uses her time to spread lies and rumors while eating nice dinners bought by you taxpayers, does not even have a plan." is the indication that the speaker in indeed questioning their opponents honestly by blatantly stating that she, the opponent, is lying and spreading rumors.