Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
The base case of [tex]n=1[/tex] is trivially true, since
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^1 E_i\right) = P(E_1) = \sum_{i=1}^1 P(E_i)[/tex]
but I think the case of [tex]n=2[/tex] may be a bit more convincing in this role. We have by the inclusion/exclusion principle
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) = P(E_1 \cup E_2) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) = P(E_1) + P(E_2) - P(E_1 \cap E_2) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) \le P(E_1) + P(E_2) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^2 E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^2 P(E_i)[/tex]
with equality if [tex]E_1\cap E_2=\emptyset[/tex].
Now assume the case of [tex]n=k[/tex] is true, that
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^k P(E_i)[/tex]
We want to use this to prove the claim for [tex]n=k+1[/tex], that
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} P(E_i)[/tex]
The I/EP tells us
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) = P\left(\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \cup E_{k+1}\right) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) = P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1}) - P\left(\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \cap E_{k+1}\right)[/tex]
and by the same argument as in the [tex]n=2[/tex] case, this leads to
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) = P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1}) - P\left(\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) \cap E_{k+1}\right) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1})[/tex]
By the induction hypothesis, we have an upper bound for the probability of the union of the [tex]E_1[/tex] through [tex]E_k[/tex]. The result follows.
[tex]\displaystyle P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^k E_i\right) + P(E_{k+1}) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^k P(E_i) + P(E_{k+1}) \\\\ P\left(\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{k+1} E_i\right) \le \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} P(E_i)[/tex]
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.