Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

A rectangle has integer side lengths. One pair of opposite sides is increased by $30\%$ and the other pair of sides is decreased by $20\%$. The new side lengths are also integers. What is the smallest possible area, in square units, of the new rectangle

Sagot :

The smallest possible area of the new rectangle is 52 square units.

In the question, we are given that a rectangle has side lengths of integral value.

We assume the lengths to be x and y units respectively, such that x and y are integers.

In the new arrangement, one pair is increased by 30%, and the other pair is decreased by 20%, such that the new sides are also integers.

We assume a 30% increase in x.

New side = x + 30% of x = x + 30/100 of x = x + 3x/10 = 13x/10.

For this to be an integer, x needs to be a multiple of 10.

Since we are considering the smallest area, we will consider the smallest multiple of 10, that is, 10 itself.

Hence, side 1 = 13 units.

We assume a 20% decrease in y.

New side = y - 20% of y = y - 20/100 of y = y - y/5 = 4x/5.

For this to be an integer, y needs to be a multiple of 5.

Since we are considering the smallest area, we will consider the smallest multiple of 5, that is, 5 itself.

Hence, side 2 = 4 units.

Now, the area of this rectangle is the product of its sides = 13*4 sq. units = 52 sq. units.

Therefore, the smallest possible area of the new rectangle is 52 square units.

Learn more about the area of a rectangle at

https://brainly.com/question/13048427

#SPJ4