Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

The Constitutional Convention limited the power of the executive branch by
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?

Sagot :

rahulsharma789888

Federalists maintained that the Constitution did not require a bill of rights because any powers not granted to the federal government were retained by the people and the states.

What defense did the Federalists make?

The counterbalanced branches of government were supported by federalists. They were able to claim that the separation of powers among the three parts of government protected the rights of the people in response to accusations that the Constitution established a powerful national authority.

The argument put up by the Federalists against creating a separate bill of rights in the Constitution Later,

might be applied to restrict privileges that weren't initially specified. Since everyone had been given the most fundamental liberties, it was not essential. As a result of the new government's limited authority, it was not essential.

Learn more about the Federalists’ argument:

https://brainly.com/question/26142635

#SPJ1

Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.