Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

The Constitutional Convention limited the power of the executive branch by
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?

Sagot :

Federalists maintained that the Constitution did not require a bill of rights because any powers not granted to the federal government were retained by the people and the states.

What defense did the Federalists make?

The counterbalanced branches of government were supported by federalists. They were able to claim that the separation of powers among the three parts of government protected the rights of the people in response to accusations that the Constitution established a powerful national authority.

The argument put up by the Federalists against creating a separate bill of rights in the Constitution Later,

might be applied to restrict privileges that weren't initially specified. Since everyone had been given the most fundamental liberties, it was not essential. As a result of the new government's limited authority, it was not essential.

Learn more about the Federalists’ argument:

https://brainly.com/question/26142635

#SPJ1

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.