Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

The Constitutional Convention limited the power of the executive branch by
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?

Sagot :

rahulsharma789888

Federalists maintained that the Constitution did not require a bill of rights because any powers not granted to the federal government were retained by the people and the states.

What defense did the Federalists make?

The counterbalanced branches of government were supported by federalists. They were able to claim that the separation of powers among the three parts of government protected the rights of the people in response to accusations that the Constitution established a powerful national authority.

The argument put up by the Federalists against creating a separate bill of rights in the Constitution Later,

might be applied to restrict privileges that weren't initially specified. Since everyone had been given the most fundamental liberties, it was not essential. As a result of the new government's limited authority, it was not essential.

Learn more about the Federalists’ argument:

https://brainly.com/question/26142635

#SPJ1

Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.