Answered

Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Connect with professionals ready to provide precise answers to your questions on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

The Constitutional Convention limited the power of the executive branch by
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?

Sagot :

rahulsharma789888

Federalists maintained that the Constitution did not require a bill of rights because any powers not granted to the federal government were retained by the people and the states.

What defense did the Federalists make?

The counterbalanced branches of government were supported by federalists. They were able to claim that the separation of powers among the three parts of government protected the rights of the people in response to accusations that the Constitution established a powerful national authority.

The argument put up by the Federalists against creating a separate bill of rights in the Constitution Later,

might be applied to restrict privileges that weren't initially specified. Since everyone had been given the most fundamental liberties, it was not essential. As a result of the new government's limited authority, it was not essential.

Learn more about the Federalists’ argument:

https://brainly.com/question/26142635

#SPJ1

Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.