yuphuobhj
Answered

Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

A man is arrested for a crime. At the police station, police question him, and he confesses. His lawyer later argues that the police should have informed the man he had the right to ask for a lawyer before speaking. The Supreme Court rules that the man, and others suspected of a crime, must be informed of their constitutional rights when they are arrested.


Which Supreme Court case does this summary describe?

A.
In re Gault
B.
Gideon v. Wainwright
C.
Tinker v. Des Moines
D.
Miranda v. Arizona

Sagot :

sc0999060

Answer:

C. Tinker v. des moines

I hope this is the correct answer

Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.