Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

A man is arrested for a crime. At the police station, police question him, and he confesses. His lawyer later argues that the police should have informed the man he had the right to ask for a lawyer before speaking. The Supreme Court rules that the man, and others suspected of a crime, must be informed of their constitutional rights when they are arrested.


Which Supreme Court case does this summary describe?

A.
In re Gault
B.
Gideon v. Wainwright
C.
Tinker v. Des Moines
D.
Miranda v. Arizona


Sagot :

Answer:

C. Tinker v. des moines

I hope this is the correct answer

Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.