yuphuobhj
Answered

Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get immediate answers to your questions from a wide network of experienced professionals on our Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

A man is arrested for a crime. At the police station, police question him, and he confesses. His lawyer later argues that the police should have informed the man he had the right to ask for a lawyer before speaking. The Supreme Court rules that the man, and others suspected of a crime, must be informed of their constitutional rights when they are arrested.


Which Supreme Court case does this summary describe?

A.
In re Gault
B.
Gideon v. Wainwright
C.
Tinker v. Des Moines
D.
Miranda v. Arizona

Sagot :

sc0999060

Answer:

C. Tinker v. des moines

I hope this is the correct answer

We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.