Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our user-friendly platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

What would be the strongest evidence to use in support of the argument that drivers over the age of 65 should be retested on a regular basis?
A.
Any driver over 65 is likely to be losing his or her eyesight and so should be tested periodically to determine if his or her vision is acceptable for driving.
B.
My friend was in a car accident that was proven to have been caused by a woman who was in her 80s and had a heart attack.
C.
The rate of motor vehicle crash deaths per capita among males in 2004 increased markedly at ages 75-79 and ages 80-84 (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety).
D.
Being retired, senior citizens do not have anywhere important to go, so they don’t need a driver’s license anyway.

Sagot :

Wh1teMamba

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

The answer is C. because, unlike A., B., and D., it is objective, or unbiased. It uses provable evidence to strengthen the argument. Stay cool <3

Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.