Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Experience the convenience of getting reliable answers to your questions from a vast network of knowledgeable experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

What would be the strongest evidence to use in support of the argument that drivers over the age of 65 should be retested on a regular basis?
A.
Any driver over 65 is likely to be losing his or her eyesight and so should be tested periodically to determine if his or her vision is acceptable for driving.
B.
My friend was in a car accident that was proven to have been caused by a woman who was in her 80s and had a heart attack.
C.
The rate of motor vehicle crash deaths per capita among males in 2004 increased markedly at ages 75-79 and ages 80-84 (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety).
D.
Being retired, senior citizens do not have anywhere important to go, so they don’t need a driver’s license anyway.

Sagot :

Wh1teMamba

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

The answer is C. because, unlike A., B., and D., it is objective, or unbiased. It uses provable evidence to strengthen the argument. Stay cool <3

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.