Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The transformation was a 180° rotation about the origin.
We can solve this question by plotting the points R (1, 1)
S (3, 1) T (1, 6) and R' (–1, –1) S' (–3, –1) T' (–1, –6) on the graph as shown below.
As we can see from the graph, the original triangle RST which was in quadrant 1, now becomes triangle R’S’T’ in quadrant 3. Thus, when triangle RST was transformed using the rule (x, y) → (–x, –y), from quadrant 1 to quadrant 3 it is a 180° rotation about the origin.
Hence, the transformation was a 180° rotation about the origin.
Your question was incomplete. Please check below for full content.
Triangle RST was transformed using the rule (x, y) → (–x, –y). The vertices of the triangles are shown. R (1, 1) S (3, 1) T (1, 6) R' (–1, –1) S' (–3, –1) T' (–1, –6)
Which best describes the transformation?
The transformation was a 90° rotation about the origin.
The transformation was a 180° rotation about the origin.
The transformation was a 270° rotation about the origin.
The transformation was a 360° rotation about the origin.
Learn more about graphical transformations here-
https://brainly.com/question/27887959
#SPJ10
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.