Answered

Westonci.ca is the premier destination for reliable answers to your questions, brought to you by a community of experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

We conclude that, in the field of public
education, the doctrine of "separate but
equal" has no place. Separate educational
facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore,
we hold that the plaintiffs and others
similarly situated for whom the actions have
been brought are, by reason of the
segregation complained of, deprived of the
equal protection of the laws guaranteed by
the Fourteenth Amendment. This disposition
makes unnecessary any discussion whether
such segregation also violates the Due
'ocess Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment.
Brown v Board of Education.

what is the main purpose of the passage?
- to inform
- to argue
- to persuade​


Sagot :

Answer:

To argue.

Explanation:

The Brown v Board of Education wanted to change the law of "separate but equal." They proposed an argument to show their points, what they wanted to change, and what was not right in terms of education.

We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.