Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Select the correct answer.
A historian publishes a paper on the ancient Greek leader Alexander the Great. However, most scholars reject his paper on the basis that the research is not reliable. Which factor could have led to this conclusion?
A.
The historian chose a subject that was unpopular among other scholars.
B.
The paper credited too many sources by renowned historians.
C.
The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.
D.
The historian taught history at a prestigious but small university.
E.
The historian regularly maintained personal historical blogs.

Sagot :

The factor that could have led to this conclusion is : ( C ) The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.

Importance of citations

The paper published by the historian lacked proper citations from renowned historians to back up his research, therefore the paper will be filled with signs of bias and this will make the readers/scholars conclude that his research was not reliable enough.

When publishing a paper about a known personality proper citations are required to backup your research so the the readers will find your paper reliable.

Hence we can conclude that The factor that could have led to this conclusion is  The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.

Learn more about proper citations : https://brainly.com/question/8130130

#SPJ1