Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Join our platform to get reliable answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
The correct answer are
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
When the premises serve to support the conclusion's accuracy and effectiveness in a reasonable manner, the argument is said to be valid.
Options B, C, and D would all be acceptable arguments presented by the plaintiffs. Because there is a risk that they may be erroneous as well (as in inductive reasoning).
"The premises are likely to be true," Because the premises and conclusion are inversely related if the premises support the conclusion, it is regarded as true, and if not, the opposite is true.
Because the conclusion follows the premises logically, it is also known as a chain of reasoning. As a result, answers B, C, and D are appropriate.
Learn more about plaintiffs
https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ4
Correct Question
Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes.
A) The premises are not true all of the time.
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.
