Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is dedicated to providing you with accurate information. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
The correct answer are
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
When the premises serve to support the conclusion's accuracy and effectiveness in a reasonable manner, the argument is said to be valid.
Options B, C, and D would all be acceptable arguments presented by the plaintiffs. Because there is a risk that they may be erroneous as well (as in inductive reasoning).
"The premises are likely to be true," Because the premises and conclusion are inversely related if the premises support the conclusion, it is regarded as true, and if not, the opposite is true.
Because the conclusion follows the premises logically, it is also known as a chain of reasoning. As a result, answers B, C, and D are appropriate.
Learn more about plaintiffs
https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ4
Correct Question
Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes.
A) The premises are not true all of the time.
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.
