Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
The correct answer are
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
When the premises serve to support the conclusion's accuracy and effectiveness in a reasonable manner, the argument is said to be valid.
Options B, C, and D would all be acceptable arguments presented by the plaintiffs. Because there is a risk that they may be erroneous as well (as in inductive reasoning).
"The premises are likely to be true," Because the premises and conclusion are inversely related if the premises support the conclusion, it is regarded as true, and if not, the opposite is true.
Because the conclusion follows the premises logically, it is also known as a chain of reasoning. As a result, answers B, C, and D are appropriate.
Learn more about plaintiffs
https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ4
Correct Question
Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes.
A) The premises are not true all of the time.
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.
