Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Discover a wealth of knowledge from experts across different disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The correct answer are
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
When the premises serve to support the conclusion's accuracy and effectiveness in a reasonable manner, the argument is said to be valid.
Options B, C, and D would all be acceptable arguments presented by the plaintiffs. Because there is a risk that they may be erroneous as well (as in inductive reasoning).
"The premises are likely to be true," Because the premises and conclusion are inversely related if the premises support the conclusion, it is regarded as true, and if not, the opposite is true.
Because the conclusion follows the premises logically, it is also known as a chain of reasoning. As a result, answers B, C, and D are appropriate.
Learn more about plaintiffs
https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ4
Correct Question
Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes.
A) The premises are not true all of the time.
B) The premises are likely to be true.
C) The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.
D) The conclusion follows logically from the premises.
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.
