Answered

Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

Sagot :

adefioyelaoye

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

Who is a Defendant?

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here https://brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.