Answered

Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Get the answers you need quickly and accurately from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

Sagot :

adefioyelaoye

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

Who is a Defendant?

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here https://brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.