Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.
Sagot :
The doctrine of strict liability may be distinguished from that of a negligence by the fact that strict liability: is liability without fault.
Even if the person or business that caused the damage or injury was not at fault or negligence , strict liability, also known as absolute liability, assigns blame for the losses or injuries.
Even if a person is not at fault, they are nevertheless required to pay damages under the strict responsibility rule. In other words, even if someone takes all the essential safeguards, they still have to compensate the victim. In reality, this idea is frequently a requirement for approvals that permit such operations.
A kind of product responsibility known as strict liability makes the selling corporation accountable for subpar or flawed goods. Strict responsibility is liability without fault, which means that the product seller is liable for damages even if the corporation wasn't at fault for the tort.
To learn more about strict liability, refer
https://brainly.com/question/14643462
#SPJ4
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.
