Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The doctrine of strict liability may be distinguished from that of a negligence by the fact that strict liability: is liability without fault.
Even if the person or business that caused the damage or injury was not at fault or negligence , strict liability, also known as absolute liability, assigns blame for the losses or injuries.
Even if a person is not at fault, they are nevertheless required to pay damages under the strict responsibility rule. In other words, even if someone takes all the essential safeguards, they still have to compensate the victim. In reality, this idea is frequently a requirement for approvals that permit such operations.
A kind of product responsibility known as strict liability makes the selling corporation accountable for subpar or flawed goods. Strict responsibility is liability without fault, which means that the product seller is liable for damages even if the corporation wasn't at fault for the tort.
To learn more about strict liability, refer
https://brainly.com/question/14643462
#SPJ4
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.
