Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

If playing the prisoner's dilemma game competitively leads to smaller rewards in the long run, why do people persist in being competitive?

Sagot :

Prisoner's dilemma - is a two-person scenario in which (1) Player A stands to benefit more from a transaction by acting selfishly toward Player B if B offers to collaborate, and vice versa; but, (2) A and B together might obtain a bigger total payoff by collaborating than by acting selfishly in both cases. The typical result of a Prisoner's Dilemma is that both players act selfishly, which results to a poor decision for both.

With this system, one may strike a balance between rivalry and competitive for the benefit of all parties.

According to game theory, a situation where two players act selfishly would ultimately lead to a poor decision or getting smaller rewards for both is known as a prisoner's dilemma. The prisoner's dilemma also demonstrates the fact that sometimes, collaboration is not the best course of action.

To learn more about Prisoner's dilemma, refer

https://brainly.com/question/22597804

#SPJ4