Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Join our Q&A platform to get precise answers from experts in diverse fields and enhance your understanding. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

What are the relevant facts and specific law that support maalick's contention that he was not promoted due to religious discrimination? be specific

Sagot :

Maalick converted to a new religion while working at Treton where he was a high-performing employee. But soon after his conversion, he started facing taunts from his co-workers in the form of notes and other items left on his desk.

Though well-qualified for a systems manager position in the company to which he applied, the job was instead given to an outsider who happens to attend the same Church as Jenkins, the facility director. Thus, Maalick filed a formal complaint with the HR director.

Sections 701 (j), 703, and 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 require employers to accommodate the religious practices of employees and prospective employees. This appears to be violated in the Maalick case.

To learn more about the Civil Rights Act of 1964: brainly.com/question/1264052

#SPJ4