Get reliable answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where our knowledgeable community is always ready to help. Connect with a community of experts ready to provide precise solutions to your questions on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

What are the relevant facts and specific law that support maalick's contention that he was not promoted due to religious discrimination? be specific

Sagot :

Maalick converted to a new religion while working at Treton where he was a high-performing employee. But soon after his conversion, he started facing taunts from his co-workers in the form of notes and other items left on his desk.

Though well-qualified for a systems manager position in the company to which he applied, the job was instead given to an outsider who happens to attend the same Church as Jenkins, the facility director. Thus, Maalick filed a formal complaint with the HR director.

Sections 701 (j), 703, and 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 require employers to accommodate the religious practices of employees and prospective employees. This appears to be violated in the Maalick case.

To learn more about the Civil Rights Act of 1964: brainly.com/question/1264052

#SPJ4

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.