At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Which primary texts, according to cremo, both past and present, offer evidence for extreme human antiquity? is such evidence valid? why / why not? be specific

Sagot :

The following primary texts, according to cremo, evidence for extreme human antiquity.

R. A. S. Macalister offers a powerful illustration of this prejudice. He stated in a textbook on archaeology published in 1921 that "we can barely hesitate in selecting between the choices of adopting or rejecting their authenticity" if a Pliocene age for the Castenedolo remains were accepted.

This demonstrates the major thesis of Forbidden Archaeology, which is that the scientific community has a knowledge filter that eliminates irrelevant evidence. This knowledge filtration procedure has been in place for well over a century and is still in use today.

To learn more about human antiquity here

https://brainly.com/question/8883381

#SPJ4