Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Which primary texts, according to cremo, both past and present, offer evidence for extreme human antiquity? is such evidence valid? why / why not? be specific

Sagot :

The following primary texts, according to cremo, evidence for extreme human antiquity.

R. A. S. Macalister offers a powerful illustration of this prejudice. He stated in a textbook on archaeology published in 1921 that "we can barely hesitate in selecting between the choices of adopting or rejecting their authenticity" if a Pliocene age for the Castenedolo remains were accepted.

This demonstrates the major thesis of Forbidden Archaeology, which is that the scientific community has a knowledge filter that eliminates irrelevant evidence. This knowledge filtration procedure has been in place for well over a century and is still in use today.

To learn more about human antiquity here

https://brainly.com/question/8883381

#SPJ4

Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.