Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Find reliable answers to your questions from a wide community of knowledgeable experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Read the following excerpt from Levitt and Dubner’s Freakonomics.

Despite all the attention paid to rogue companies like Enron, academics know very little about the practicalities of white-collar crime. The reason? There are no good data. A key fact of white-collar crime is that we hear about only the very slim fraction of people who are caught cheating. Most embezzlers lead quiet and theoretically happy lives; employees who steal company property are rarely detected.

With street crime, meanwhile, that is not the case. A mugging or a burglary or a murder is usually tallied whether or not the criminal is caught. A street crime has a victim, who typically reports the crime to the police, who generate data, which in turn generate thousands of academic papers by criminologists, sociologists, and economists. But white-collar crime presents no obvious victim. From who, exactly, did the masters of Enron steal? And how can you measure something if you don’t know to whom it happened, or with what frequency, or in what magnitude?

The excerpt helps the authors support their conclusion by
evaluating a logical fallacy.
providing statistical evidence.
presenting logical statements.
summarizing their claim.

Sagot :

The inference is that the excerpt helps the authors support their conclusion by A. evaluating a logical fallacy.

What is an inference?

It should be noted that the inference is the conclusion that based on the information given. In this case, logical fallacy simply means an argument which can be disproven through reasoning. In such scenario, it is different from a subjective argument as it can be deceptive and logically flawed in a way

Logical fallacy used invalid or faulty reasoning to constitute an argument. In order to spot logical fallacy, one can look out for bad proof, or the disconnection between the proof and the conclusion.

From the information given, it was stated that despite all the attention paid to rogue companies like Enron, academics know very little about the practicalities of white-collar crime.

Therefore, the inference is that the excerpt helps the authors support their conclusion by evaluating a logical fallacy.

Learn more about inference on:

brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ1

We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.