Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Intruding objects are older in the law of inclusion.
The statement of option A describes the difference between the law of inclusion and the law of crosscutting in relative dating of rocks and fossils.
How can we understand that this statement describe the difference?
- The Law of Inclusions was described by James Hutton and stated that if a rock body contained fragments of another rock body, it must be younger than the fragments of rock it contained. The intruding rock must have been there first to provide the fragments.
- The Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships states that if a fault or other body of rock cuts through another body of rock then it must be younger in age than the rock.
- That means the rock or object which intrudes according to the law of inclusion is more older than the law of crosscutting relationships.
Therefore, Intruding objects are older in the law of inclusion. So, option A is correct.
Learn more about law of inclusion :
https://brainly.com/question/20325905
#SPJ1
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.