Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

Read the following statements.

Statement 1: "If she is stuck in traffic, then she is late."
Statement 2: "If she is late, then she is stuck in traffic."
Statement 3: "If she is not late, then she is not stuck in traffic."

Sue writes, "Statement 2 is the converse of statement 3 and contrapositive of statement 1."
Kim writes, "Statement 1 is the inverse of statement 2 and converse of statement 3."

Who is correct?

Only Kim is correct.
Both Sue and Kim are correct.
Both Sue and Kim are incorrect.
Only Sue is correct.


Sagot :

The conclusion of the conditional statements is that; Both Sue and Kim are correct.

How to interpret Conditional Statements?

We are given the following statements;

Statement 1: "If she is stuck in traffic, then she is late."

Statement 2: "If she is late, then she is stuck in traffic."

Statement 3: "If she is not late, then she is not stuck in traffic."

Now, A contrapositive statement is one that contradicts the subject and the predicate. This can be stated as; "if not B, then not A ". In this sense, we can opine that Kim is correct when she says that Statement 3 is the contrapositive of statement 1.

Meanwhile, a converse statement is obtained by turning around the positions of the hypothesis and the conclusion. This can be stated as; "if p, then q" is "if q, then p." Thus, Sue is correct to say that; "Statement 2 is the converse of statement 1 and contrapositive of statement 3."

Read more about Conditional Statements at; https://brainly.com/question/11073037

#SPJ1