Answered

Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Write a pin addressing one or more of the following questions:

In the case "Brazil vs. the U.S. at the WTO," why did Brazil’s ambassador to the WTO make a deal with the U.S. trade negotiators? Has this approach been effective so far? Do you think this will be effective in the long run at getting the U.S. to drop its subsidies?
In the case "The U.S.-China Wind power Dispute," do you think that GE, Gamesa, and other foreign firms did the right thing by not pushing the U.S. government to bring China to the WTO over its prohibited subsidies?
What is a drawback to relying heavily on prohibited subsidies to sustain your business?

Respond to at least one of your peers. This is your opportunity to discuss the information further with your classmates or to discuss whether you agree or disagree and state why or why not with a response of at least 65 words.

Be professional and courteous in all communication with your peers. You are expected to follow the Netiquette Guidelines. Students who fail to follow these guidelines may receive a deduction in their overall discussion grade.

Sagot :

anthougo

1. Brazil's ambassador to the WTO made a deal with the U.S. trade negotiators because Brazil threatened sanctions and the United States wanted to avoid trade retaliations.

2. The threat of sanctions and trade retaliations has been effective so far as trade rules are being adhered to by both Brazil and the United States.

3. So far, this approach has been effective in getting the U.S. to drop its prohibited subsidies to cotton producers.

4. In the case "The U.S.-China Wind power Dispute," GE, Gamesa, and other foreign firms did not do the right thing by not pushing the U.S. government to bring China to the WTO over its prohibited subsidies.

5. A drawback to relying heavily on prohibited subsidies to sustain a business is that it is not sustainable in the long term.

What are prohibited subsidies?

Prohibited subsidies are the subsidies given to local entities to encourage exports or domestic use of raw materials or goods.

Prohibited subsidies distort international trade and hurt the trade of other countries.

Thus, prohibited subsidies violate WTO commitments and are barriers to international trade.

Learn more about trade barriers athttps://brainly.com/question/1326741

#SPJ1

Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.