Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
Answer:
D. Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is enough evidence to oppose the gaming company's claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let μ = mean time to complete a role-playing game.
The company claims that their role-playing games take over 65 hours to complete, so the hypotheses are:
H₀: μ = 65 H₁: μ > 65
Therefore, this is a one-tailed test.
The significance level is 1%, so α = 0.01.
Find the value of the test statistic (z):
[tex]\textsf{sample mean }\overline{x}=63,\quad \sigma=10, \quad n=300[/tex]
[tex]\implies z=\dfrac{\overline{x}-\mu}{\sigma / \sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{63-65}{10 / \sqrt{300}}=-2\sqrt{3}=-3.4641...[/tex]
Using the “Percentage Points of The Normal Distribution” table, the critical value is z = 2.3263 meaning the critical region is Z > 2.3263.
Since z = -3.4641... < 2.3263, the observed value of the test statistic lies outside the critical region. Therefore, the result is not significant.
Conclusion
There is sufficient evidence at the 1% level of significance to fail to reject H₀ and to oppose the alternative hypothesis that the mean time to complete the role-playing game is more than 65 hours.


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.