OoItzCuteAngeloO2
Answered

Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

state two reasons why historians refute the claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India ??​

Sagot :

gautamarvind37

Historicians refute the claim that the

British introduced the rule of law in

India on account of two main reasons,

Firstly, colonial law was not devoid of

arbitrariness. The Sedition act of 1870

bears testimony to this. This Act allowed

the police to arrest any person protesting

against the British government, without

due trial.

Secondly, Indian nationalists played a

pivotal role in the framing of the Indian

Constitution that upholds equality of all

to law.

Hence, historians vehemently refute the

claim that the British introduced the role

of law to India, because Indians were

constantly discriminated against in

various spheres of the social, political

and administrative life of the country.

Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.