Welcome to Westonci.ca, your ultimate destination for finding answers to a wide range of questions from experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

A routine audit of a cost-reimbursable (cr) contract determines that overcharges are being made. if the contract does not specify corrective action, the buyer should?

Sagot :

The buyer should Continue to make project payments if the contract does not specify the corrective action in this situation the routine audit of a cost-reimbursable (cr) contract determines that overcharges are being made

What is meant by Cost reimbursable ?

The buyer would be in breach of the contract if they stopped all payments. It is too severe to breach the contract and start legal proceedings on your own. The issue is not resolved by altering the contract to call for more frequent audits. The optimum response would presumably be to "Halt payments on the disputed amount," but that option is not available. The best option is to keep making the installments.

To learn more about cost reimbursable contract, check the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/23183570

#SPJ4