At Westonci.ca, we provide clear, reliable answers to all your questions. Join our vibrant community and get the solutions you need. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

What was the functional relationship between priests and rulers in southeast asia?

Sagot :

As kings, they began to take over many of the jobs previously performed by priests. Finally, the king, who was in charge of things that kept the city running (such as irrigation), became the chief judge. The priest only performed religious duties.

What would you say about the relationship between kings and priests?

  • East Asia, China, Japan, India, Europe (among the Germanic and Scandinavian kings), Africa (in the great empires), and Madagascar have all had a close relationship between sacred kingship and priestly cultic functions.
  • The division of functions occasionally resulted in the transfer of the royal title to those who performed cultic functions.

  • From the beginning of time in Africa, there was a type of king known as the Lord of the Earth; he originally combined political and cultic functions but, as time passed, only the cultic ones remained.
  • The strict separation of the priestly and kingly offices, as in India, where the king and priest are from different castes—Kshatriya and Brahman, respectively—is an unusual exception.
  • The king may be the recipient of a direct revelation of a god's will. Thus, the pharaoh of Egypt received a divine oracle through dreams in the temple.

To learn more about Relationship between priests and rulers refer to

https://brainly.com/question/876887

#SPJ4