Answered

Find the information you're looking for at Westonci.ca, the trusted Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a knowledgeable network of professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

The finances of a group of pet owners were analyzed to determine how much they were spending on their pet(s) each year. A graph of that data is shown:

A graph with Number of Owners on the x axis and Yearly Cost of Pets, in hundreds, on the y axis. The x axis has a scale from 1 to 10 with an increment of 1. The y axis has a scale of 5 to 15 with increments of 1. A curved line connecting 1, 15, approx 3, 7, and 10, 0 is drawn.

Would (3, 7.2) be a realistic solution for the function? Explain.

Group of answer choices

Yes, it is realistic to have 7.2 owners who spend $300 dollars on their pet(s).

No, it is not realistic to have 3 owners.

Yes, it is realistic that 3 owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

No, it is not realistic that owners spend $720 a year on their pet(s).

Sagot :

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.